Gun Permits issued for Breaking Laws for Police?

Dear Connecticut Governor Malloy, December 31, 2012

Should citizens who smoke crack cocaine, slam into an African American woman’s car over 7 miles of road drunk while yelling the N Word at her, who sleeps with prostitutes, is on psychotropic drugs, is bi-polar, and who claims to be a sociopath who wants to have sex with both young boys and girls have gotten dibs on my property in Stafford Springs, Connecticut, and help in getting a gun permit for committing crimes for police?

I was published in letters to the editor and proposed Civilian Oversight of Police to Tony Guglielmo and former Representative Mordasky. I was told that State Police liaison Stephen (or Steven) Spellman told elected officials that they were not allowed to propose civilian legislation of police and that police were going to make me wish I was never born. I was told I would have to pay $100/day fines for informants throwing trash on my property after calling Troop C about trash being thrown on my property.

I had to pay taxes to towns I did not live in, paying multiple times for the same vehicles to keep my Connecticut driver’s license and ability to have registered vehicles. I was sent a bill for $140,000 for sales tax for my painting business to an address saying my property could be seized if I did not pay in 30 days. I had $140,000 in equity in Connecticut real estate at that time. I was told I had to pay over $30,000 to fix perfectly fine sewer pipes in my Somersville property. I was being harassed by the building and health inspectors after I was told I was kicked out of Connecticut by Resident Trooper Mulcahey and Stafford Springs, Connecticut, police officer Frank Prochaska.

Police were actively offering criminals, prostitutes, drug dealers, and thieves incentives to attack me and/or to make up false police reports so I could be railroaded to prison.

I was told by Barbara S., and Peter Coukos, who claimed to be Connecticut State Police informants that if I did not leave Connecticut and shut my mouth I would not see my daughter again, I would lose my contracting business, and go to prison for the rest of my life. I was told that police were enforcing a “no dating” policy and that I was under 24/7 surveillance for being a “Big Mouth”. I was told by police I was not allowed to own property in Connecticut, and that I was not allowed to speak at public hearings.

I went to prison for being attacked on my property by a police informant. My daughter now does not talk to me. I lost my business. I was told I was kicked out of Connecticut and that I would spend the rest of my life in prison if I complained about police officers and if I did not leave Connecticut by Stafford Springs Officer Desso who is also the LT of the Guards upon my release from Bergin CI, prison, in Storrs, CT.

Should crazy drug addicts be given gun permits for breaking laws for police? Should police get away with perjury? Should I be compensated and have my record expunged?

Steven G. Erickson [address snipped]                             [telephone number snipped]

my address and phone number are available by emailing: stevengerickson AT Yahoo.com

[click here] for more information and video

[click here] for text of complaint to FBI

Should the Connecticut State Police be disarmed for their rampant brutality and misconduct and for lack of any quality control? [reasons]

Should [these reasons] be considered on why a Sandy Hook Newtown Connecticut shoolyard shooting happened in Connecticut and not another state?

Should the Peter Reilly case be used to show that Connecticut State Police will even go after a Supreme Court Judge if he questions dishonest State Police investigations and manufactured evidence? [post]

The Connecticut State Police and the FBI can't investigate their own misconduct. [Example]

If you make a complaint and any of it is even just a little wrong, or false, and get arrested. Make a legitimate complaint and there are no questions, nothing.


* * * *

Use Cocaine get Connecticut Gun Permit?


Text with video:

Would police offer property and a gun permit to a bi-polar, crack cocaine smoking, known sociopath who also takes psychotropic drugs if he is willing to commit crimes for police? The answer is yes, and his initials are P.C., in Stafford Springs, Connecticut. I wrote the Connecticut Governor [this letter today], and check post for his name. Sleep with prostitutes, want to sleep with little boys and girls, and be a crazy drug user and police prefer you to those who pay taxes, raise families, and who have small businesses.

I believe the Newtown Connecticut Sandy Hook Schoolyard shooting stinks, as if the Connecticut State Police and Paul Vance are involved it about lying and a cover up. If Connecticut State Police will go after and threaten a Supreme Court Justice for complaining about shoddy, fraudulent police investigations and manufactured evidence, anything is possible if no corrections to [this behavior] has been executed.

Should police offer gun permits to those who commit crimes for them? Should police have their own criminals gangs and be Mafia at your tax dollar expense? [Cop Mafia] post also has pictures, video, and a picture of my former wife that an overweight police officer who lived with his mother slammed me into my house because he was infatuated with her. She showed him no interest.

Should Americans be disarmed so police can commit more crimes? Should Obama as UN Security Council Head take all guns from Americans because his International Banker and Corporate Pirate masters told him to?

P.C. leaves a message for my then 14 year old daughter. [audio].

After I had already been arrested once for being attacked on my property and P.C. threatened to make a false police report regarding a gun and his trying to extort $30,000 not to help police railroad me to prison, PC was punching me in the back of the head, telling me he wanted my then 14 year old daughter to get on her knees and perform oral sex on him. I took the punches to the back of my head and back as to not get arrested again for being attacked on my own property. I thought if I fought back in my own backyard that I would never see my daughter again and spend the rest of my life in prison if I turned around. I got prison based on Connecticut State Police perjury and my daughter will probably never talk to me again for having been to prison.

So, let international criminals take away American's right to bear arms and let's see how that works out for you.


http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/2013/01/useful-dangerous-idiots.html

GW Bush Part 6 - Bush Was AWOL

Text with below video:

People keep saying, wrongly, that due to the fact that Dan Rather got fired, GW Bush is innocent of going AWOL.

The lady in the white jacket is the reporter biotch, hardcore info hunter that finds out the truth, tracked down everything there is to know about GW Bush's National Guard duty.

If you are a guy, then you should know that there are certain females who will find out the truth, and this is one of the best. Seriously, do you think this lady would have this wrong, after listening to her?

I cut out the less essential parts of this interview, to keep it short.

What do you think? Do you think GW Bush was AWOL from the National Guard, the way this reporter claims?

Bonus topic: at 6:06, she explains how journalists have to bury the news to keep their jobs, just like the Syrian journalists who recently defected for the same reason.

This series:
GW Bush - Commander in Chief
GW Bush Part 2 - National Guard Duty Segment 1
GW Bush Part 3 - National Guard Duty Segment 2 - AWOL Question
GW Bush Part 4 - National Guard Duty Segment 3 - Fox News Uncovers Info Buried by CBS
GW Bush Part 5 - National Guard Duty Segment 4 - Dan Rather's Rebuttal
GW Bush Part 6 - Bush Was AWOL



* * * *

[click here] for:

Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership

[more]

Feeling Secure in Your Home, Fundamental?

I was listening to Alex Jones yesterday evening on youtube.com. He said that some states those who are are being paid tax dollars is a greater number than some of the private sector totals! So, if true there could be more people living off of tax dollars than are paying in. We the people are ripe for the plucking as we are putting up with too much, far too easily.

All of the below is [re-posted from here]

Sen. Wyden: FISA’s ‘general warrants’ are like the ‘Writs of Assistance’ the founding fathers despised

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) today opened debate into the renewal of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Amendments by allowing one of the statute’s most vocal critics, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), to opine about the “the constitutional teeter-totter, with the security and well-being of all of us on this side and individual liberties on this side” that the Senate must weigh in the course of the debate.

Wyden began his remarks with a history lesson of the nation’s early days, when British authorities issued “Writs of Assistance” to allow constables and customs officers to search any house or building in an effort to eliminate colonists’ tax-avoiding smuggling. “The problem, of course, is if you let government officials search any house that they want, they’re going to search through the houses of a lot of people who haven’t broken any laws,” Wyden said. But, he noted, “The colonists said it’s just not okay to go around invading people’s privacy unless you’ve got some specific evidence that they’d done something wrong,” and “The fact that English officials went around invading people’s privacy without any evidence against them was one of the fundamental complaints the American colonists had against the British government” prior to the Revolutionary War.

“So naturally,” he said, “our founding fathers with the wisdom they showed on so many matters made it clear that they wanted to address this particular complaint when they wrote the bill of rights.” In fact, Wyden offered, “[The Fourth Amendment] was a direct rejection of the authority that the British had claimed to have when they ruled the American colonies: the founding fathers said that our government does not have the right to search any house that government officials want to search, even if it helps them to do their job.”

“For more than 200 years,” Wyden added, “this fundamental principle has protected Americans’ privacy while still allowing our government to enforce the law and protect public safety.”

To those that would argue that the Constitution’s architects were silent about the Internet and thus their guarantees of personal privacy need not apply, Wyden also had a rebuke. “Certainly, the Founding Fathers could never have envisioned Tweeting, Twitter, and the Internet and all of these extraordinary technologies,” he acknowledged. “But what we have seen as technology has continued to bring us this treasure trove of information all of these spectacular opportunities the Founding Fathers never envisioned, we saw time and time again the Congress and the courts were most successful when they returned to the fundamental principles of the Fourth Amendment.”

Wyden then proceeded to quote Justice Louis Brandeis’ dissent in the 1928 Olmstead v. United States, both for its vociferous advocacy in favor of personal privacy and to note that, though it was a dissenting opinion in 1928, the courts and Congress eventually agreed that technology does not negate fundamental rights. “Justice Brandeis said the right of the people to be left alone by their government is the most comprehensive of rights,” Wyden summarized, “And, what he said, the right ‘most valued by civilized men.’” So “As we look today’s debate,” Wyden added, “it’s so important that we recognize what Justice Brandeis said about the value of getting it right when it comes to liberty, when it comes to individual freedom.”

Wyden noted that, despite being a member of the Intelligence Committee when the Bush Administration devised and implemented its warrantless wiretapping program, he — like most Americans — read first about its existence in the New York Times. “There was a very heated debate, [and] Congress passed the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 and that was to replace the warrantless wiretapping program with new authorities for the government to collect the phone calls and emails of those believed to be foreigners outside the United States.” But despite provisions which its advocates claimed would protect Americans from unconstitutional searches, Wyden says the loophole built into what is now Section 702 has allowed the government to intrude on Americans’ privacy.

“Unlike the traditional FISA authorities and unlike law enforcement wiretapping authorities, section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act does not involve obtaining individual warrants,” Wyden explained. “Instead, it allows the government to get what’s called a programmatic warrant, lasts for an entire year, and authorizes the government to collect a potentially large number of phone calls and emails with no requirement that the senders or recipients be connected to terrorism, espionage, the threats that we are concerned about.”

“If that sounds familiar,” he added, “It certainly should. General warrants that allowed government officials to decide whose privacy they would invade were the exact sort of abuse that the American colonists protested over and led the Founding Fathers to adopt the Fourth Amendment in the first place.”

“It is never okay, never okay for government officials to use a general warrant to invade the privacy of a law-abiding American,” Wyden stated. “It was not okay for constables and customs officials to do it in colonial days, and it is not okay for the National Security Agency to do it today.”

But, he said, they are nonetheless doing so. “This law doesn’t actually prohibit the government from collecting Americans’ phone calls and emails without a warrant,” he said, because “the FISA Amendments Act states that acquisitions made under Section 702 may not ‘intentionally target a specific American,’ and may not ‘intentionally acquire communications that are known at the time of acquisition to be wholly domestic,’” which Wyden considers too large a loophole.

“It still leaves a lot of room for circumstances under which Americans’ phone calls and emails, including purely domestic phone calls and emails could be swept up and reviewed without a warrant,” he said, which “can happen if the government didn’t know that someone is American, or if the government made a technical error, or if the American was talking to a foreigner even if that conversation was entirely legitimate.”

Not only could it happen, he said, but it has happened. “The FISA court has ruled at least once that collection carried out by the government under the FISA Amendments Act violated the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. Senate rules regarding classified information prevent me from discussing details of that ruling or how many Americans were affected over what period of time, but this fact alone, Mr. President, clearly demonstrates that the impact of this law on Americans’ privacy has been real and it is not hypothetical.”

Wyden and some of his colleagues are proposing that the Administration be forced to calculate and reveal the exact number of Americans whose privacy his been violated by Section 702, in addition to other changes designed to “rebalance” Wyden’s teeter-totter.

Watch the full speech, first uploaded on C-SPAN, below.



[click here for original source of above for links to go with post]

Is FBI for Killing Americans for Foreign Powers?

Pg 61 from FOIA req FBI doc, "... An identified as of October planned to en Iacks .196 against protestors in Houston, Texas, if deemed necessary. An indentifiedl had ib7C received intelligence that indicated the protesters in New York and Seattle planned similar protests in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, and Austin, Texas. (p)lanned to gather intelligence against the leaders of the protest groups and obtain photographs, then formulate a plan to kill the leadership via suppressed sniper rifles. (Note: protests continued throughout the weekend with approximately 6000 persons in NYC. "Occupy Wall Street" protests have spread to about half of all states in the US, ..."

Text with below video:

Opednews.com author Scott Baker asserts that there is allegedly an FBI plan to kill citizens who engage in Free Speech. He asserts that there were plans to kill Occupy Wall St. OWS planners and organizers before the movement took off. [link]

Corporations aren't people, they are foreign powers. If the FBI and State Police met with Wall St. bankers and foreign corporation owners to plan covert operations, they conspired with foreign powers against Americans in America for outsiders. Are for police, the FBI, NSA, TSA, DHS, the UN, US courts, and the US Government for protecting outside interests, not Americans?

If you want an explanation for the Natalie Portman and other pics, my Opednews.com writing [can be found here] and you will see a pop up that will ask you to donate to the site where you can easily close out and see links to stories.

Was the War of 1812 really an invasion of World Banks into America, where we lost our sovereignty? In 1815 Rothschild bank spies rushed into London to seed false news reports that the UK had lost the war against Napoleon at Warterloo. It was false information so that the Rothchilds could Financially invade the UK, as after stock plummeted in the UK, the Rothschilds took ownership of the UK. We in the US are owned by a cabal of international bankers, probably part of the same Rothschild conspiracy. Lawyers and judges allegedly sold all of America out during the War of 1812 with secret agreements.

These offshore don't want Americans to have Free Speech or guns. These criminals own us all on paper. Do you want to be educated as to not be a slave?

Are bankers building a bunker of 1000's of miles of underground highways, bunkers, and stockpiling weapons and fuel to squash America using trillions of dollars of US taxpayer dollars? [story and video]

  FBI Citizen Kill List?

Clintons are Poster Children for Lying Lawyers!

Have you ever wondered why lawyers should not hold elected offices? Should drug traffickers who kiss international banker and corporate pirate butts be in charge of all government policies? Well, meet the Clintons in the below documentary:



The above video source is James Corbett or The Corbett Report.

[Click here] for:

Crime Boss, UN Security Council Head?

[more]

-

Steven G. Erickson's reasons for blogging can be found below:

[click here] for:

"Getting Made" in the Cop Mafia?

[more]

Why I hate lawyers can be [found here].

Why I hate judges can be [found here]. Judge Jonathan J. Kaplan is the poster child of a scumbag judge in my opinion.

[click here] for:

Letter Complaining to CT Atty Gen about Attorney Michael H. Agranoff

Attorney Michael H. Agranoff

Attn. Attorney General and/or staff:

Subject: Docket # CR01-0074672,
Rockville Court, Connecticut, 20 Park St.

I would like to complain about Attorney Michael H. Agranoff of
99 Stafford Road, Rt. 30
Ellington, CT 06029
[more]

Has US Sovereignty been Signed Away?

Check out video below.

If you ask to be represented for you taxes, asking elected officials to listen to you as you redress grievances is just asking an excuse for the elected official to give your name to police, so at roll call, you photo, name, address, what you drive, and where you work for you to be put on the secret police arrest on site list.

If you word search Elena Sassower on youtube.com and look for a black and white video about Hillary Clinton, and former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer. Allegedly that video was the one the FBI considered looking into Spitzer's finances to find out that he hired $6000 per lay elite prostitutes causing him to resign as Governor.

My friend that I talk about who worked on the plans for the F-35 US super fighter [found here], his initials are CK.

A lot of links can be [found here]

Obama has allegedly been ordered to put out a sign statement Dec 27 or 31 to start to process all private gun held in American hands. A CIA Al Qaeda taxpayer program where hand held missiles to take aircraft will find their way from Syria to America. One will allegedly be used to take out an aircraft taking off from an airport to blow it up with a full tank of fuel. That way all Americans can be stopped at road blocks to be set up all over the US and be searched along with their cars. The TSA will then issue travel passes. This is what is being talked about by political activists.

Are rocket launchers given to CIA's Al Qaeda in Syria going to find their way to the US, so an event can be staged to shoot a US airplane taking off from an American airport for an excuse for the TSA, Military, and Police can block roads and sidewalks to search everyone and their vehicles? [more]

Typical Craigs List Scam:

I like using Craigs List to sell things. It is free. The same scammers are out scamming all the time. If our US Government wasn't criminal itself, it would go after these scammers. The problem is that our offshore bankster owners and their corporate pirate friends are too busy scamming us to use our tax dollars to protect and serve. Okay, that is a whole other story.

I had posted in the ad, "NO SHIPPING".

This is actual text back from a scammer:

Text to me came in from (305) 209-5786

9:29 PM (2 hours ago)

Yes. I am interested in it amd I'm ready to purchase it from you Asap. I am ok with the price and i perfectly understand the present condition as started in the Ad. I would have prefer cash-on-pick-up but i won't be able to do that due to the nature of my work. I'm ready to proceed with payment via Certified Check. I'm in no rush with you till funds has been cleared in your bank. I'll handle the shipment myself as i will setup a shipper who will come and get it at your place. Kindly get back with the below information for me to issue the check to you. The payment will be overnighted to you via US Postal Service. Name On Check: Address: City: State: Zipcode : Phone Number. Please withdraw the advert from CL to avoid interruption