Tuesday, August 25, 2009

The Pretend CIA Torture Investigator/Prosecutor?

AP Photo by Bob Child, file

John Durham
U.S. Prosecutor From New Haven To Lead Investigation Into CIA

By EDMUND MAHONY The Hartford Courant

4:59 p.m. EDT, August 24, 2009

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said Monday he has appointed career federal prosecutor John Durham of New Haven to investigate whether the CIA or its employees broke the law by using overly aggressive techniques when interrogating overseas terror suspects.

Holder said Durham's new duties, at least initially, will involve a relatively narrow, preliminary review to determine if there is enough evidence to warrant a full investigation of whether current of former CIA employees violated anti-torture or other laws when questioning high value, terror detainees.

Durham was appointed in part, Holder said, because of his involvement in an ongoing, related investigation of CIA practices regarding terror suspects. In 2008, former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey asked Durham to investigate the destruction of CIA videotapes of detainee interrogations.

Some of the videotapings allegedly depicted brutal treatment, including waterboarding. Durham and a team of investigators are working with a federal grand jury in Virginia.

"During the course of that investigation, Mr. Durham has gained great familiarity with much of the information that is relevant to the matter at hand," Holder said Monday in a statement released by the U.S. Department of Justice. "Accordingly, I have decided to expand his mandate to encompass this related review."

Holder said Durham has a "strong investigative team of experienced professionals" in place and has been asked, in connection with the new appointment, to recommend "whether there is sufficient predication for a full investigation into whether the law was violated in connection with the interrogation of certain detainees."

The new Durham appointment came in the wake of two other significant moves by the Obama administration in the area of the detention and interrogation of high-value terror suspects.

The administration was preparing to release a newly unclassified, 2004 report by the then CIA inspector general detailing CIA treatment of terror suspects. The report says one interrogator threatened to kill the children of a Sept. 11 suspect, and another may have threatened to assault a suspect's mother in front of him. A federal judge in New York forced the administration to release the secret report after a lawsuit from the American Civil Liberties Union.

President Obama also approved the creation of a new, multi-agency interrogation unit for suspected terrorists that will be based at the FBI but overseen by policy-makers at the White House and its National Security Council.. The HIG, or High-Value detainee interrogation Group, is considered by some observers as an administration effort to distance itself from allegedly coercive interrogation methods used by the administration of President George W. Bush.

Holder said he decided to move closer toward possible criminal prosecution of CIA interrogators after reading a number of still-classified reports, including one by the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility examining memos by Bush Administration legal advisers that authorized what Holder called "so-called enhanced interrogation techniques."

The OPR report recommends that the Justice Department re-examine previous decisions to decline prosecution in several cases related to the interrogation of certain detainees, Holder said. He said he hopes to make much of the report public after it is vetted for classified material.

"As a result of my analysis of all of this material, I have concluded that the information known to me warrants opening a preliminary review into whether federal laws were violated in connection with the interrogation of specific detainees at overseas locations," Holder said.

Disagreements over the release of interrogation memos, photographs of detainees and what to do with detainees at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have resulted in a year of political clashes over the shape of a future U.S. war on terror.

Holder's decision Monday to inch toward a criminal investigation seems on its face to clash with the view expressed by President Obama, who has repeatedly said he wants to "move forward" rather than dwell on controversies generated by his predecessor.

"I fully realize that my decision to commence this preliminary review will be controversial," Holder said. "In this case, given all of the information currently available, it is clear to me that this review is the only responsible course of action for me to take."

The White House said Monday the decision of possible prosecution belongs to Holder.

"The White House supports the attorney general making the decisions on who gets prosecuted and investigated," Deputy White House press secretary Bill Burton said.

However, critics like U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman of began weighing in against Holder's decision Monday afternoon.

"I respectfully regret this decision by Attorney General Holder and fear our country will come to regret it too because an open-ended criminal investigation of past CIA activity, which has already been condemned and prohibited, will have a chilling effect on the men and women agents of our intelligence community whose uninhibited bravery and skill we depend on every day to protect our homeland from the next terrorist attack," Lieberman said.

Copyright 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

* * * *
* * * *

John Durham was, and still is, allegedly the "go to guy" to help cover up police, judicial, attorney, official misconduct, and public corruption in the state of Connecticut, and now maybe he has gone national, or even global, in being a "tool". Police officers in Connecticut can allegedly pay state registered confidential informants sums of plus, or minus, $10,000 in taxpayer funds, to kill, maim, injure, set up for malicious prosecutions, citizens who get in the way, or dare lodge public corruption or police misconduct complaints. So, if a guy can get his feet wet being the black bag man for official street thugs wearing badges, what can he do for the current national black bag ops, currently out and about?
[a post about John Durham's past police misconduct cover ups?]

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Obama: “Don't Investigate Reverse Racism Complaints”?

Is the USDOJ for helping cover up public corruption or do they really investigate and act in the best interest of the public?

I talked with William Doriss last night, and today, video of that posted above. He's about 65 and complained about the police and courts near his former New Haven, Connecticut, home. There are known to be separate and unequal sections for Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics. Is Doriss' claim that the USDOJ in DC not investigating cases of reverse racism true?

Well, there might just be plenty of documents and proof. I will be posting what I find out in the form of text, video, and audio telephone interviews, if, and as, I get material. I have a judicial misconduct and abuse blog [located here].

Mr. Doriss was terrorized out of Connecticut by authorities and still faces up to 69 years in prison for children having witnessed his dog attack a smaller one across the street from his former business in New Haven. Risk of Injury to Minors is a felony punishable up to 20 years per count. As an antiques dealer, Doriss, allegedly also faced serious jail time for having placed a couch on the sidewalk in a bulk trash pile awaiting pick up in his New Haven, Connecticut, neighborhood.

William Doriss told me last night that a Kevin Walker from the US Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, told him (Doriss) that the word had been handed down from Obama himself that claims of reverse racism would not be investigated by the USDOJ.

Just another reason to have a People's Court and Investigation System. [more]

There are more and more examples of citizens who wish to reform the system by contacting their elected officials, get mouthy in blogs, or who lodge police and judicial misconduct complaints who are domestically spied on, targets of police, and even railroaded to prison. [a good example]


Thursday, August 06, 2009

Judicial License to Steal?

View My Stats