DCF
Text of email sent to stevengerickson AT yahoo Dot Com:
* * * *
Steven G. Erickson interviews Cheryl Martone a half hour, or so, ago, by telephone (16 min):
* * * *
Channel 3 News WFSB video and story about DCF abuse in Connecticut:
http://www.wfsb.com/story/16769327/dcf
* * * *
An alleged Connecticut police officer caught up in a federal lawsuit because of a lying DCF worker comments in [this post].
* * * *
CONNECTICUT COURT RULE CORRUPTION; "Don't Take Any Wooden Nutmegs" Video Art Version
Text with video:
Uploaded by frankknee on Jul 19, 2011
Cleaned-up -Life As Art Version
CONNECTICUT COURT RULE CORRUPTION;
"Don't Take Any Wooden Nutmegs"
The Title is the original source of of the phrase: "Don't Take Any Wooden Nickles" referencing the unscrupulous yankee peddlers of the past..
The story of citizens rallying together to restore Justice in Connecticut. The documentary follows the discussion about how Connecticut forms its Practice Book Rules. What citizens found was astounding. 70% of marital wealth is lost during Divorce, and now Nutmeg Judges want even a bigger chunk...
Produced and Directed by Francis C. P. Knize
Ct. General Statute 51-14 was passed in 1957 to limit the authority of the court to promulgate practice book rules which prohibited (shall not) abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right or the jurisdiction of any of the courts."
Despite admonitions provided to the Rules Committee at the Supreme Court on May 31, and despite letters which have been delivered to the legislature which has the responsibility to follow the law including General Statute 51-14 protocols which require hearings to be conducted by the judiciary committee before such rules could be promulgated (adopted) for implementation.
Information obtained from the Office of Legislative research reported March 9, 2009, showed that a legislative fellow traced each and every practice book rule modification, and wrongly found that the Supreme Court self determined that the legislature had no authority over the Practice Book Rules modification approval process--He cited unspecific references to the Constitution of the State of Connecticut, which don't exist--which in fact, gave the legislature no authority to approve the rules of practice.
Documents which have been obtained under the Freedom of Information Act reveal that letters have been going from either the chair of the Rules Committee or the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court annually to the members of the judiciary committee in April of every year, showing clandestine meetings in the Supreme Court chambers, ie..non-public meeting with the Rules Committee and Supreme Court Justices, to review the proposed Rules of Practice.
According to this OLR document of 24 pages, tracing every single rules modification proposed since 1957, there has never been a single rule which has been rejected by the General Assembly by resolution--which is the proscribed proceedure outlined in Ct. General Statute 51-14 (b).
Such a lack of oversight of following the proper protocols by the legislature and its judiciary committee is a "wanton, willful and malicious" failure to uphold the laws to protect the citizens of the State of Connecticut from the self empowerment of the judiciary of the State of Connecticut which has resulted in a series of modifications since which have abridged the General Statute 51-14 prohibiting "judicial self empowerment" embodied in the words "the court shall have judicial discretion".
Prior to 1957, the Practice Book was a law. Since 1957, the egregious and absolute abuse of the acquisition of power by the jurists in the State of Connecticut, with the full complicity of the lawyers who sit on the public administrative committees of the judiciary, the full slate of judges in the State of Connecticut, the court administrators, the Governor, and the Attorney General's Office has participated in the unlawful abridgment of the Powers of Separation.
Further jurisdictional authority has been granted to the federal courts when a state does not enforce its own laws. Since virtually every member of the legislative judiciary committee was a lawyer by training, it is believed that in their private legal practices, the legislators received preferential decisions from judges who have made favorable rulings for the law firms where these legislators/lawyers are gainfully employed.
We know that the JRC has conducted only 11 public hearings over the years on judicial misconduct. The reason, we discover was in the word "should" in the old code was deemed by the JRC to not require (shall) that the judges take certain actions to acknowledge "conflicts of interests" which have abounded for years.
However, since a new Code of Judicial Conduct went into effect on January 1, 2011 which now requires ("shall") judges to hold proper disqualification hearings upon the filing of motions under Practice Book Rule 2.16 (e), the balance of power has shifted to allow for any of us to require an evidentiary hearing to allow a citizen to build a record for appeal of judicial bias and prejudice.
We can only continue to fight this "bare knuckles" battle of corruption in the family court system of our Constitutional and civil rights as parents to the love, care and companionship of our children as a fundamental liberty interest defined in the words "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
* * * *
* * * *
[Steven G. Erickson's LiveLeak.com video uploads]
[click here] for post with video called, "Now, Even More Questions in the Nancy Schaefer Case?"
[click here] for post called, "Government Goons out hunting you, out hunting children"
[click here] for:
When Moral Outrage turns to Action
Michael Nowacki, New Canaan, Connecticut, Patriot
[more]
* * * *
[click here for the retired Hartford Connecticut Narcotics Detective Rich Murzin family saga]
* * * *
* * * *
US Depression II Art pic and video:
http://www.opednews.com/Diary/US-Depression-II-Art-by-Steven-G-Erickson-120208-896.html
My mission:
http://thesrv.blogspot.com/2012/01/acta-obama-and-international-protest.html
Ritt Goldstein proposed Civilian Oversight of Police at a special Legislative Judiciary Committee in the State of Connecticut, Dec. 1996, and then fled to Sweden seeking political asylum soon after. [This video shows all the elements of a major US collapse, even worse now]
* * * *
[click here] for:
Connecticut's Organized Crime and Racism History
Mr. Clean's Swan Song
[more]
http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/2011/03/new-world-order-kkk-type-world.html
* * * *
If elected officials actually cared about addressing the problems of public corruption, judicial misconduct, Connecticut State Police Brutality, and the scourge that is the Department of Children and Families, they would ask questions, not just sit in silence after listening to citizens described the felonies that officials are guilty of of. [Misprison of a Felony] is a misdemeanor, or felony. Describing felonies committed by officials, to officials, where officials do nothing, is a crime. But, officials, lawyers, judges, and police are of a different, higher tier of society, not subject to the same laws as we the people are. We are just crops to be harvested, or slaves to be beaten in the field.
Steven G. Erickson speaks CT DCF Hearing
Text with video:
Uploaded by SvenVonErick on Feb 11, 2009
Steven G. Erickson speaks CT DCF Hearing
* * * *
Added Feb. 16, 2012:
Judges/DCF Kidnapping Scam
Text with video:
More info [click here]. Nancy Schaefer, a former Georgia State Representative tried to blow the whistle on the kidnapping scam that is Department of Children and Families. She and her husband were allegedly murdered to keep organized crime, judges, and other officials safe from actual prosecution for kidnapping, racketeering, obstruction of justice, other felonies, and crimes against humanity. Check link.
Steven G. Erickson interviews Dot Knightly about American Justice and Family Issues in included video (audio interview).
International Corporation owners and bankers run the US court system, government, and military. If State Attorney Generals were not in charge of defending States, and their contractors, in lawsuits where citizens have complaints, AND taking the complaints which is a conflict of interest maybe citizens would have some rights in the US. If judges weren't rigging court cases for the profit of lawyers and organized crime, maybe we'd have justice in the US.
Dot Knightly's blog, the Unhappy Grammy [found here]. Dot is fighting the family court system in Nashua, New Hampshire. The family court system, the civil procedure system, and the criminal courts in America are all rigged from profit and abuse. I am paying attention, especially to what is happening in Vermont, Massachusetts, New York City, Connecticut, Florida, Arizona, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island, and other US states.
The reasons that I think that the US should begin bombing Iran, or not bombing Iran, are found in [pictures and links here]. [just more pictures], click to make bigger.
-
[click here] for:
Almost Zero Quality Control of Judges
Politicians, police, and corporate big wigs all can rest assured if they have a corrupt judge in their pocket. It is all about favors and retaliation.Cases are fixed. Select people get rich.
Others lose everything and go to jail based on corrupt practices, not legitimate reasons. How much worse does it have to get, before Americans are so outraged they take action in numbers?
Richard "Rick" Guliani was the probate judge in Portland from 1991 to 2006.
[more]
-
http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/2008/10/exiled-father-joey-watley-ct.html
DCF and Police Misconduct in the State of Connecticut:
http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/2008/03/typical-connecticut-police-scheming.html
-
6 Comments:
again stevie boy gets himself right in the middle of a shit storm
Shit storm?
We're all in a shit storm. Many of us just don't know it yet. We are under siege. Organized criminals are the police, the government, and the courts. They are a subsidiary of our international banking and corporate owners. They want you to cringe in terror and to be silent. They are showing us with the abuse that they own us. Is that okay with you?
If not, act.
ur buddy gowacky is gonna get at least 5 years in the clink u r lucky to be livin stevieboy
Although this is a supposedly professional subject oriented blog, GO FUCK YOURSELF ANONYMOUS!
Please don't stop this fight. I have solid evidence of the corruption from judges to clerks in Mass. I'm in this fight. Contact me. About to sue.
Would be interested in hearing stevengerickson AT yahoo dot com
Post a Comment
<< Home