A 9-11 Court Case to Watch

Cynthia McKinney, author of except below. Photo with short biography on webpage [found here]


Excerpt:

The issue is heating up in America as well, and will soon be heard in court.

Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop saw disturbing things up close that have not been reported in the media.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, she was ordered by her supervisor to go directly to work at the Pentagon, before dropping off her ten-week-old son Elisha at day care.

Amazingly, the infant was given immediate security clearance upon arrival.

The instant Gallop turned on her computer an enormous explosion blew her out of her chair, knocking her momentarily unconscious.

Escaping through the hole reportedly made by Flight 77, she saw no signs of an aircraft -- no seats, luggage, metal, or human remains. Her watch (and other clocks nearby) had stopped at 9:30-9:31 a.m., seven minutes before the Pentagon was allegedly struck at 9:38 a.m.

The 9/11 Commission reported that "by no later than 9:18 a.m., FAA centers in Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Washington were aware that Flight 77 was missing and that two aircraft had struck the World Trade Center."

Why then were there no anti-aircraft defenses, Gallop asks, or alarm warnings inside the Pentagon?

Gallop was briefed by officials not to tell her story in public; she also received an email from a Fox News reporter who had been told by the Pentagon not to interview her.

Gallop now believes that officials within the Bush Administration conspired to destroy the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center and WTC 7 -- the third building brought down at 5:20 p.m. that day -- with pre-placed explosives detonated after the planes hit.

On April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut, the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.

Gallop's case relies on virtually all forms of evidence admissible in court, but significantly, on published scientific evidence that residues of these explosives were found in the rubble after the attacks. In its totality the proffered case establishes that the government hypothesis -- that the buildings collapsed due to fire in combination with the airplane impacts -- is scientifically untenable.

In addition, Ms. Gallop will, through photographic and other physical evidence, as well as the testimony of a multitude of military and civilian survivors, demonstrate the impossibility of her having lived through the attack on the Pentagon if it had taken place as the government and the defendants claim.

German Federal Judge, Deiter Dieseroth, stated in December 2009 that:

"No independent court has applied legal procedures to review the available evidence on who was responsible for the attacks."

Also, that "it is not acceptable for a constitutional state...to declare war, bomb a foreign country, and place it under military occupation," without first identifying suspects.

Dieseroth also said the U.S. "was under burden of proof" that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, yet the FBI admits it has no evidence presentable in court to back this up.

The stakes in this case are epic, including the possibility of an overwhelming transformation of the world's understanding of history, not to mention American citizens' relationship with their government. [more from source, Cynthia McKinney, Opednews.com]

* * * *
* * * *

http://thesrv.blogspot.com/2011/03/remember-building-7.html

Is the New World Order, a World version of the KKK, that now accepts Jews and Catholics?:
http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/2011/03/law-enforcement-shooting-citizens-in.html

-

James Corbett of the Corbett Report talks about Fukushima, the 3-11 Japan Earthquake, HAARP, and other subjects in video, here:
http://www.opednews.com/Diary/The-James-Corbett-Report-a-by-Steven-G-Erickson-110328-924.html

This blogger's beef, sent to Vermont elected officials, text, video, and photos:
http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/2011/02/letter-text-to-us-vermont-senators.html

* * * *

Is the FBI the initiator of almost all supposed terrorist plots against the US?:
http://thesrv.blogspot.com/2011/03/paul-craig-roberts-message-and.html

-

Why aren't White Male Judges Punished like the non-connected ones?

Connecticut just might be the best state to show off as an example of what is most wrong with all of the rest.

The below re-posted [from here]

Siting Council Chairman Resigns After Accusation of Improper Communication (WEB FIRST)

By JASON SIEDZIK

HARTFORD — The Connecticut Siting Council’s chairman, facing accusations of improper communication, resigned from his seat just one day after public hearings on the proposed Colebrook wind turbines concluded.

Daniel Caruso resigned from the council Thursday, as noted in a press release from Governor Dannel Malloy’s office. The chairman also serves as a probate judge in Fairfield, and according to a letter from Save Prospect attorney Jeffrey Tinley to the Connecticut Siting Council’s executive director Linda Roberts, Mr. Caruso inappropriately discussed BNE Energy’s proposal for wind turbines in Prospect during this line of work.

“Judge Caruso said ‘They’re all nice people. But it’s a lot of b---‘,” Mr. Tinley wrote in the letter. “He then posed a rhetorical question, with words to the effect: The fact that some little town in Massachusetts decides to push these things back 3,000 feet, why should we care about that?”

“He said we are going to do what we have to do,” continued Mr. Tinley.

Save Prospect formed in reaction to a proposal by BNE Energy to build three wind turbines in town. The project would be similar to either half of a pair of proposals in Colebrook, and BNE Energy’s proposals have run into similar opposition. The ex parte communication lasted no more than three minutes, in Mr. Tinley’s estimation, and related to the proceedings at evidentiary hearings in Prospect, namely the line of questioning toward Save Prospect’s president. Save Prospect had invited, in Mr. Caruso’s words, “those people from Massachusetts” to speak at the March 15 evidentiary hearing.

“He said that we (the Siting Council) come up against objections all the time and we always try to listen to the concerns of opponents and take whatever steps can be taken within reason to mitigate adverse impacts,” Mr. Tinley wrote.

Mr. Tinley was present in Fairfield Probate Court on March 18 for an unrelated case, involving the Garofalo estate, along with his partner at his law firm and other attorneys. Mr. Caruso called Mr. Tinley into his chambers after the hearing concluded, “saying something to the effect of ‘Are we’ or ‘how are we’ going to get this done by March 31,” the last day of evidentiary hearings on the Prospect petition.

“I again tried to deflect the issue by stating that whenever a judge tells me that he is interested in hearing something, I take it seriously,” Mr. Tinley wrote. “Judge Caruso said that wasn’t the point; he said that it was important we understand in this context how the Siting Council operates.”

Mr. Tinley also stated Mr. Caruso accused Save Prospect’s noise expert of “pooh-poohing” a question regarding mitigating the noise of turbines, adding, “He said that it wasn’t very smart for a witness who is asked a question by the Chair to ‘pooh-pooh’ it.” The proposed turbines in Prospect and Colebrook would be the first of their kind in the state and have prompted several reactions; one proposed bill would direct the Connecticut Siting Council, along with other state agencies, to adopt regulations regarding wind turbines before any could be built.

“I knew that the Siting Council had publicly taken a position against wind specific regulations and that a Siting Council representative had listened to the testimony and had testified at the legislative hearings on this subject,” Mr. Tinley wrote in the letter. “Judge Caruso said that regulations were not necessary and brought the subject back to the hearings, reiterating that the process was not going to stop and would be finished before anything is finished in the legislature.” Continued...

The below re-posted [from here]

State Police Want Superior Court Judge Arrested in Connection With Salisbury Case (WEB FIRST)

SALISBURY (AP) — Connecticut State Police have applied for a warrant to arrest a Superior Court judge for coercion and hindering a criminal investigation in Salisbury.

The Republican-American newspaper reported Thursday that Judge Corinne L. Klatt has declined to sign an arrest warrant application targeting a Salisbury man accused of attacking a man who was communicating with his former girlfriend in November unless she receives an arrest warrant for the victim.

Salisbury Resident Trooper Mark Lauretano now wants the judge arrested, saying her actions amount to “coercion and a violation of criminal law.”

The newspaper reports that Judge Klatt declined to comment in Litchfield’s Bantam Court or say why she refused to sign an arrest warrant application for the man singled out by police as the assailant in a fight at the West Main Cafe in Salisbury.

A call to Troop B headquarters confirmed that a warrant had been drawn up but was as yet unsigned.

* * * *
* * * *

This blogger's beef with Connecticut State Police brutality and Judicial Misconduct:
http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/2011/02/letter-text-to-us-vermont-senators.html

stevengerickson AT yahoo Dot Com

[click here] for:

Law Enforcement shooting citizens in the back with shotguns and getting away with it

John Grindle, 30, Klan member from Livingston, Texas, poses with son John Jr., 6, with Bible and portrait of the Klan's Imperial Grand Wizard. 'Signs of the Anti-Christ," according to the Klan, are peace movements, the United Nations, Jewry and communism. Photo by Ron Laytner, Edit International

Comment posted about Connecticut DCF

I posted the below comment [in this] OpedNews.com article called, "Billion Dollar Drug Company Law Firm Restructures Connecticut Welfare System"

Major Official Organized Crime

DCF in Connecticut is organized crime. Security guards who not DCF case workers buying drugs from drug dealers, even on surveillance video in Hartford face discipline, not the DCF workers breaking the law. Many tipsters have told me DCF are the tools police use to enforce preferred drug dealers keeping their turf. I interview a police officer's ex-wife and that only scratches the surface. [audio interview]

Yale University and the Drug Companies have long abused the public. Look at Lyme Disease and that fraud in treatment and testing.

A whistle blower in the Connecticut Department of Mental Retardation was set up for arrest. She was then set up by a Connecticut physician and given prescription drugs to make her appear crazy so she'd be committed. [that story]

The former Connecticut Governor John G. Rowland allegedly conspired with DCF head, Kristine Regaglia, and the Connecticut mob to see that as many children as possible were taken away, even from good parents, so he and Kristine would receive bribes and the mob would get to build, supply, and run facilities such as "Kiddie Max" prisons for kids. [more info]

[general Connecticut public corruption]

Only the absolute sleaziest and dishonest Federal Judges are exposed

... but they seem to continue to collect tax dollars while damaging America, Americans, and further sinking the country's reputation.

Text with below video:
Uploaded by RTAmerica on Mar 9, 2011

A staff member of the Helsinki Commission - set up to promote democracy, security and human rights - has accused Florida Rep. Alcee Hastings of repeated unwelcome sexual advances, touching and retaliation. The former co-chair of the commission, as well as the commission itself, has been slapped with a sexual harassment lawsuit by a watchdog filing on behalf of Winsome Packer.

Congress sex scandal -- again!


* * * *

This blogger's complaint with the ridiculousness of policing, representation for our taxation, and "justice" in America:
http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/2011/02/letter-text-to-us-vermont-senators.html

[click here] for:

Are the Real Criminals the ones operating Police CCTV?

SEC Charges Connecticut Investment Adviser with Running a Ponzi Scheme

The below re-posted from
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2011/03/sec-charges-connecticut-investment-adviser-with-running-a-ponzi-scheme.html

The SEC today amended its complaint against Francisco Illarramendi, a Stamford, Conn.-based investment adviser, and his firm MK Capital Management LLC, to additionally charge them with engaging in a multi-year Ponzi scheme involving hundreds of millions of dollars. The SEC previously obtained an asset freeze against them in January, alleging that they had misappropriated at least $53 million in investor assets.

In a parallel action today, the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the District of Connecticut unsealed criminal charges against Illarramendi for the same misconduct as well as for obstruction of justice for deliberately misleading the SEC staff during its investigation.

The SEC alleges that Illarramendi and MK Capital Management – which is not registered with the SEC – have misappropriated investor assets and misused two hedge funds they manage for Ponzi-like activity in which they used new investor money to pay off earlier investors. During the SEC’s investigation in December 2010 and January 2011, Illarramendi attempted to hide the fact that his hedge funds were missing assets by providing the SEC staff with a false letter from an accountant in Venezuela that purported to verify the existence of approximately $275 million in assets held by one of the funds. Those assets do not exist.

Since the filing of the original complaint on Jan. 14, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut entered an order on Jan. 28, 2011, freezing the assets of Illarramendi and his firm. On Feb. 3, 2011, the Court appointed a receiver in the case.

Fusion Center Locations and Information

re-posted from here
http://publicintelligence.net/fusion-center-locations-revealed/

Fusion Center Locations Revealed

February 16, 2011 in News

Location of the Arizona Counter Terrorism Intelligence Center. Photo from Bing Maps.

Public Intelligence

Since 9/11, the U.S. Government has engaged in a multibillion-dollar effort to construct a domestic intelligence network for the ostensible purpose of combating terrorism, criminal activity and violent extremism. One of the central components of this system is the network of “fusion centers” that have sprung up around the country over the last several years. These entities integrate local law enforcement with a state’s police force, Department of Justice, or Office of Emergency Management and are designed to facilitate law enforcement intelligence activities throughout the jurisdiction, providing federal authorities access to local information and databases, while simultaneously allowing federal agencies to disseminate classified intelligence materials to local authorities. There are almost always federal representatives present in local fusion centers and Secretary of Homeland Security Napolitano has recently testified that DHS is “committed to having an officer in each fusion center.” Most fusion centers also work with representatives of the private sector, particularly those industries related to so-called “critical infrastructure and key resources.”

Due to past examples of fusion centers vastly overstepping their original mandates, including monitoring political events, bumper sticker preferences and even constitutionally-protected protest activities, many civil-rights organizations have worked to monitor fusion centers and their activities. However, public scrutiny has proved difficult in most cases as the majority of fusion centers operate in a highly secretive manner without revealing who works for them, what government agencies they work with or what their basic capabilities are. Many lack websites or any sort of public presence and information about their activities is often unavailable from official sources. There is no national authority overseeing their activities and many fusion centers even lack basic privacy policies concerning the collection of information on law-abiding citizens. Some states have even worked to exempt fusion center activities from public records requests. In fact, the majority of fusion centers have failed to even identify their most basic attribute: their physical location. Instead, many fusion centers simply provide a mailing address that leads to a post office box or generic government building. Some fusion centers do not even provide an address.

Public Intelligence has acquired a dataset that identifies the actual physical locations of nearly all of the 72 DHS-recognized fusion centers operating in the country today. The information, which includes physical addresses, phone numbers, as well as email addresses for all of the fusion centers, is believed to have been compiled and distributed throughout the Homeland Security Information Network, a government information portal for “information sharing and collaboration between federal, state, local, tribal, territorial, private sector, and international partners engaged in the homeland security mission.” Given the incomplete nature of information distributed previously by EPIC, the ACLU, and other groups attempting to document fusion center activities, this information is of great importance for working towards transparency in an area of domestic surveillance that remains largely unreported.

Name of Fusion Center	Mailing Address	Physical Address
Alabama Fusion Center	Post Office Box 1511 Montgomery, AL 36102	201 S Union St Montgomery, AL 36104
Alaska Information and Analysis Center (AKIAC)	101 East Sixth Avenue Anchorage, AK 99501	101 East Sixth Avenue Anchorage, AK 99501
Arizona Counter Terrorism Information Center (ACTIC)	Post Office Box 6638 Phoenix, AZ 85005	16212 N 28th Ave Phoenix, AZ 85053
Arkansas State Fusion Center	1 State Police Plaza Drive Little Rock, AR 72209	1 State Police Plaza Drive Little Rock, AR 72209
Orange County Intelligence Assessment Center	2644 Santiago Canyon Road Silverado, CA 92676-9791	2644 Santiago Canyon Road Silverado, CA 92676-9791
Los Angeles Joint Regional Intelligence Center (LAJRIC)	12440 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650	12440 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650
Northern California Regional Intelligence Center (NCRIC)	P.O. Box 36102 San Francisco, CA 94102	450 Golden Gate Ave., 14th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102
Central California Intelligence Center/Sacramento Regional Terrorism Threat Assessment Center		3720 Dudley Blvd. McClellan, CA 95652
State Terror Threat Assessment Center	Post Office Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244	3741 Bleckley St. Mather, CA 95655
San Diego Law Enforcement Coordination Center (SD-LECC)		4181 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA 92123
Colorado Information Analysis Center	690 Kipling Street Lakewood, CO 80215	690 Kipling Street Lakewood, CO 80215
Connecticut Intelligence Center (CTIC)	600 State Street New Haven, CT 06511	600 State Street New Haven, CT 06511
Delaware Information Analysis Center	Post Office Box 430 Dover, DE 19904	1575 McKee Rd. Dover, DE 19904
Washington Regional Threat and Analysis Center	2720 Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20032	300 Indiana Ave NW Washington, DC 20001
Florida Fusion Center	P.O. Box 1489 Tallahassee, FL 32302	2331 Phillips Road Tallahassee, FL 32308
Miami Dade Fusion Center		11200 NW 20th St Doral, FL 33172
Central Florida Intelligence Exchange (CFIX)	PO Box 608423 Orlando, Florida 32860	6643 Hazeltine National Drive Orlando, FL 32860
Georgia Information Sharing and Analysis Center (GISAC)	Post Office Box 29649 Atlanta, GA 30359	2635 Century Parkway, N.E. Atlanta, GA 39345
Pacific Regional Information Clearinghouse	500 Ala Moana Blvd. Honolulu, HI 96813	500 Ala Moana Blvd. Honolulu, HI 96813
Idaho Criminal Intelligence Center	700 S Stratford Dr, Meridian, Ada, Idaho 83642	700 S Stratford Dr, Meridian, Ada, Idaho 83642
Statewide Terrorism & Intelligence Center (STIC)	2100 S. Dirksen Parkway Springfield, IL 62703	2100 S. Dirksen Parkway Springfield, IL 62703
Indiana Intelligence Fusion Center	302 W. Washington Street Room E243 Indianapolis, IN 46204	302 W. Washington Street Room E243 Indianapolis, IN 46204
Iowa Fusion Center	215 East 7th Street Des Moines, Iowa 50319	215 East 7th Street Des Moines, Iowa 50319
Kansas Threat Integration Center (KSTIC)	2722 Southwest Topeka Blvd Topeka, KS 66611	2722 Southwest Topeka Blvd Topeka, KS 66611
Kentucky Fusion Center	Post Office Box 1757 Frankfort, KY 40602	200 Mero St Frankfort, KY 40622
Louisiana State Analytical and Fusion Exchange (LA-SAFE)	376A East Airport, Baton Rouge, LA 70806	376A East Airport, Baton Rouge, LA 70806
Maine Intelligence Analysis Center	45 Commerce Drive, Suite 1 Augusta, ME 04330	164 State House Station Augusta, ME 04330
Maryland Coordination and Analysis Center (MCAC)		7125 Ambassador Road Woodlawn, MD 21244
Boston Regional Intelligence Center (BRIC)		One Schroeder Plaza Roxbury, MA 2120
Commonwealth Fusion Center	124 Acton Street, 2d Floor Maynard, MA 01754	124 Acton Street, 2d Floor Maynard, MA 01754
Michigan Intelligence Operations Center		714 S. Harrison Road East Lansing, MI 48823
Detroit Southeast Michigan Information and Intelligence Center		28 Adams Ave E Detroit, MI 48226
Minnesota Joint Analytical Center		Suite 820 111 Washington Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55401
Mississippi Analysis and Information Center	1 MEMA Drive Pearl, MS 39208	1 MEMA Drive Pearl, MS 39208
KC Regional TEW	635 Woodland Ave., Suite 2105B Kansas City, MO 64106	635 Woodland Ave., Suite 2105B Kansas City, MO 64106
Missouri Information Analysis Center		2302 Militia Drive Jefferson City, MO 65101
St. Louis Terrorism Early Warning Group		7900 Forsyth Blvd St. Louis, MO 63105
Montana All-Threat Intelligence Center (MATIC)	Post Office Box 4789 Ft. Harrison, MT 59636	2225 11th Ave Helena, MT 59601
Nebraska Information Analysis Center		3800 NW 12th St Lincoln, NE 68521
Nevada Threat Analysis Center	555 Wright Way Carson City, NV 89711	2478 Fairview Drive Carson City, NV 89701
Southern Nevada Counter-Terrorism Center	6767 Spencer Street, Las Vegas Nevada 89119	6767 Spencer Street, Las Vegas Nevada
New Hampshire Information and Analysis Center		110 Smokey Bear Blvd Concord, NH 03305
New Jersey Regional Operations Intelligence Center	Post Office Box 7068 West Trenton, NJ 08628-0068	2 Schwarzkopf Drive West Trenton, NJ 08628
New Mexico All Source Intelligence Center (NMASIC)	PO Box 27111 87502	13 Bataan Blvd., Santa Fe, NM 87504
New York State Intelligence Center	630 Columbia Street Extension Latham, NY 12110	630 Columbia Street Extension Latham, NY 12110
North Carolina Information Sharing and Analysis Center		310 New Bern Ave. Raleigh, NC 27601
North Dakota State and Local Intelligence Center		400 Fraine Barracks Rd Bismarck, ND 58506
Cincinnati/Hamilton Regional Terrorism Early Warning Group		2000 Radcliff Drive Cincinnati, OH 45204
Strategic Analysis and Information Center	2855 West Dublin Grandville Road Columbus, OH 43235	2855 West Dublin Grandville Road Columbus, OH 43235
Oklahoma Information Fusion Center	6600 N Harvey Oklahoma City, OK 73116	6600 N Harvey Oklahoma City, OK 73116
Terrorism Fusion Center (TITAN)	610 Hawthorne Ave., Suite 210 Salem, OR 97301	610 Hawthorne Ave., Suite 210 Salem, OR 97301
Pennsylvania Criminal Intelligence Center (PaCIC)	1800 Elmerton Avenue Harrisburg, PA 17110	1800 Elmerton Avenue Harrisburg, PA 17110
Rhode Island State Fusion Center		10 Dorrance St Providence, RI 02903
South Carolina Intelligence and Information Center		1731 Bush River Road, Columbia, SC 29210
South Dakota Fusion Center		1302 US 14 Pierre, SD 57501
Tennessee Regional Information Center		901 R.S. Gass Boulevard Nashville, TN 37243
Houston Regional Intelligence Service Center		5320 N. Shepherd Drive Houston, TX 77091
North Central Texas Fusion Center	4300 Community Avenue McKinney, TX 75071	4300 Community Avenue McKinney, TX 75071
Texas Intelligence Center		5805 N. Lamar Blvd. Austin, TX 78752
Statewide Information & Analysis Center (SIAC)	410 West 9800 South, Suite 370 Sandy, Utah 84070	410 West 9800 South, Suite 370 Sandy, Utah 84070
Vermont Fusion Center	188 Harvest Lane Williston, VT 09405	188 Harvest Lane Williston, VT 09405
National Capital Region Intelligence Center		4100 Chain Bridge Road Fairfax, VA 22030
Virginia Fusion Center		7700 Midlothian Turnpike Richmond, VA 23235
Washington State Fusion Center (WSFC)	Post Office Box 42600 Olympia, WA 98504	1110 Third Ave, Seattle, WA 98101
Southeastern Wisconsin Terrorism Alert Center		749 West State St Milwaukee, WI 53233
Wisconsin Statewide Intelligence Center	Post Office Box 7857 Madison, WI 53707-7857	2445 Darwin Rd Madison, WI 53703
Wyoming Criminal Intelligence Center		316 West 22 Street Cheyenne, WY 82002

* * * *

Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura FEMA CAMP Full length


Text with video:

Uploaded by HairyCookieMunster on Feb 21, 2011

Resistance Radio
http://www.resistradio.com


FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode

* * * *

Wall Street (Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura)


Text with video:

Uploaded by shameonewschannel on Feb 12, 2011

Jesse goes inside the secret billionaire's boy's club to find out what caused
the financial meltdown and how the group allegedly continues to manipulate and
control the stock market and oil, gold and silver prices. From Wall Street to
Washington, the governor barges in on the rich and powerful to demands answers.

* * * *

http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/2011/03/dumbing-down-of-america-being-told-what.html


* * * *

Was this blogger, Steven G. Erickson, a target of Homeland Security Fusion Centers for having proposed legislation to elected officials and for blogging about public corruption?:
http://thegetjusticecoalition.blogspot.com/2011/02/letter-text-to-us-vermont-senators.html


[click here] for:

Target on Enemies List

"Person of Interest" designation for Steven G. Erickson, widely distributed among Troops of the Connecticut State Police, Capitol Guard, Hartford Police, and Special State Police Investigative Unit. The above is a poor copy off a pdf file, copied from the original distributed among police, probably in color as part of the Connecticut State Police Secret Enemies List special day handout. Is [this] what Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell, or her staff, would want me arrested on sight for?

* * * *

Does the US Government and US States want to end Americans right to use cash to transact amongst each other? Do offshore corporations and banksters have to have a hand in every aspect of YOUR life?

[click here] for:

Selling 2nd Hand Items for Cash to Neighbors illegal in Louisiana?

[more]

-

US has history of doing grisly human experimentation

• Images: Ugly US Medical Experiments Uncovered

The below re-posted from here
http://www.wmur.com/r/27014937/detail.html

Grisly US Gov't Testing On Humans Revealed

Asylum Inmates Given Flu; Soldiers With Syphilis Left Untreated

MIKE STOBBE, AP Medical Writer

ATLANTA -- Shocking as it may seem, U.S. government doctors once thought it was fine to experiment on disabled people and prison inmates. Such experiments included giving hepatitis to mental patients in Connecticut, squirting a pandemic flu virus up the noses of prisoners in Maryland, and injecting cancer cells into chronically ill people at a New York hospital. Much of this horrific history is 40 to 80 years old, but it is the backdrop for a meeting in Washington this week by a presidential bioethics commission. The meeting was triggered by the government's apology last fall for federal doctors infecting prisoners and mental patients in Guatemala with syphilis 65 years ago. U.S. officials also acknowledged there had been dozens of similar experiments in the United States - studies that often involved making healthy people sick. An exhaustive review by The Associated Press of medical journal reports and decades-old press clippings found more than 40 such studies. At best, these were a search for lifesaving treatments; at worst, some amounted to curiosity-satisfying experiments that hurt people but provided no useful results. Inevitably, they will be compared to the well-known Tuskegee syphilis study. In that episode, U.S. health officials tracked 600 black men in Alabama who already had syphilis but didn't give them adequate treatment even after penicillin became available. These studies were worse in at least one respect - they violated the concept of "first do no harm," a fundamental medical principle that stretches back centuries. "When you give somebody a disease - even by the standards of their time - you really cross the key ethical norm of the profession," said Arthur Caplan, director of the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Bioethics. Some of these studies, mostly from the 1940s to the '60s, apparently were never covered by news media. Others were reported at the time, but the focus was on the promise of enduring new cures, while glossing over how test subjects were treated. Attitudes about medical research were different then. Infectious diseases killed many more people years ago, and doctors worked urgently to invent and test cures. Many prominent researchers felt it was legitimate to experiment on people who did not have full rights in society - people like prisoners, mental patients, poor blacks. It was an attitude in some ways similar to that of Nazi doctors experimenting on Jews. "There was definitely a sense - that we don't have today - that sacrifice for the nation was important," said Laura Stark, a Wesleyan University assistant professor of science in society, who is writing a book about past federal medical experiments. The AP review of past research found:

A federally funded study begun in 1942 injected experimental flu vaccine in male patients at a state insane asylum in Ypsilanti, Mich., then exposed them to flu several months later. It was co-authored by Dr. Jonas Salk, who a decade later would become famous as inventor of the polio vaccine. Some of the men weren't able to describe their symptoms, raising serious questions about how well they understood what was being done to them. One newspaper account mentioned the test subjects were "senile and debilitated." Then it quickly moved on to the promising results.

In federally funded studies in the 1940s, noted researcher Dr. W. Paul Havens Jr. exposed men to hepatitis in a series of experiments, including one using patients from mental institutions in Middletown and Norwich, Conn. Havens, a World Health Organization expert on viral diseases, was one of the first scientists to differentiate types of hepatitis and their causes. A search of various news archives found no mention of the mental patients study, which made eight healthy men ill but broke no new ground in understanding the disease.

Researchers in the mid-1940s studied the transmission of a deadly stomach bug by having young men swallow unfiltered stool suspension. The study was conducted at the New York State Vocational Institution, a reformatory prison in West Coxsackie. The point was to see how well the disease spread that way as compared to spraying the germs and having test subjects breathe it. Swallowing it was a more effective way to spread the disease, the researchers concluded. The study doesn't explain if the men were rewarded for this awful task.

A University of Minnesota study in the late 1940s injected 11 public service employee volunteers with malaria, then starved them for five days. Some were also subjected to hard labor, and those men lost an average of 14 pounds. They were treated for malarial fevers with quinine sulfate. One of the authors was Ancel Keys, a noted dietary scientist who developed K-rations for the military and the Mediterranean diet for the public. But a search of various news archives found no mention of the study.

For a study in 1957, when the Asian flu pandemic was spreading, federal researchers sprayed the virus in the noses of 23 inmates at Patuxent prison in Jessup, Md., to compare their reactions to those of 32 virus-exposed inmates who had been given a new vaccine.

Government researchers in the 1950s tried to infect about two dozen volunteering prison inmates with gonorrhea using two different methods in an experiment at a federal penitentiary in Atlanta. The bacteria was pumped directly into the urinary tract through the penis, according to their paper.

The men quickly developed the disease, but the researchers noted this method wasn't comparable to how men normally got infected - by having sex with an infected partner. The men were later treated with antibiotics. The study was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, but there was no mention of it in various news archives. Though people in the studies were usually described as volunteers, historians and ethicists have questioned how well these people understood what was to be done to them and why, or whether they were coerced. Prisoners have long been victimized for the sake of science. In 1915, the U.S. government's Dr. Joseph Goldberger - today remembered as a public health hero - recruited Mississippi inmates to go on special rations to prove his theory that the painful illness pellagra was caused by a dietary deficiency. (The men were offered pardons for their participation.) But studies using prisoners were uncommon in the first few decades of the 20th century, and usually performed by researchers considered eccentric even by the standards of the day. One was Dr. L.L. Stanley, resident physician at San Quentin prison in California, who around 1920 attempted to treat older, "devitalized men" by implanting in them testicles from livestock and from recently executed convicts. Newspapers wrote about Stanley's experiments, but the lack of outrage is striking. "Enter San Quentin penitentiary in the role of the Fountain of Youth - an institution where the years are made to roll back for men of failing mentality and vitality and where the spring is restored to the step, wit to the brain, vigor to the muscles and ambition to the spirit. All this has been done, is being done ... by a surgeon with a scalpel," began one rosy report published in November 1919 in The Washington Post. Around the time of World War II, prisoners were enlisted to help the war effort by taking part in studies that could help the troops. For example, a series of malaria studies at Stateville Penitentiary in Illinois and two other prisons was designed to test antimalarial drugs that could help soldiers fighting in the Pacific. It was at about this time that prosecution of Nazi doctors in 1947 led to the "Nuremberg Code," a set of international rules to protect human test subjects. Many U.S. doctors essentially ignored them, arguing that they applied to Nazi atrocities - not to American medicine. The late 1940s and 1950s saw huge growth in the U.S. pharmaceutical and health care industries, accompanied by a boom in prisoner experiments funded by both the government and corporations. By the 1960s, at least half the states allowed prisoners to be used as medical guinea pigs. But two studies in the 1960s proved to be turning points in the public's attitude toward the way test subjects were treated. The first came to light in 1963. Researchers injected cancer cells into 19 old and debilitated patients at a Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital in the New York borough of Brooklyn to see if their bodies would reject them. The hospital director said the patients were not told they were being injected with cancer cells because there was no need - the cells were deemed harmless. But the experiment upset a lawyer named William Hyman who sat on the hospital's board of directors. The state investigated, and the hospital ultimately said any such experiments would require the patient's written consent. At nearby Staten Island, from 1963 to 1966, a controversial medical study was conducted at the Willowbrook State School for children with mental retardation. The children were intentionally given hepatitis orally and by injection to see if they could then be cured with gamma globulin. Those two studies - along with the Tuskegee experiment revealed in 1972 - proved to be a "holy trinity" that sparked extensive and critical media coverage and public disgust, said Susan Reverby, the Wellesley College historian who first discovered records of the syphilis study in Guatemala. By the early 1970s, even experiments involving prisoners were considered scandalous. In widely covered congressional hearings in 1973, pharmaceutical industry officials acknowledged they were using prisoners for testing because they were cheaper than chimpanzees. Holmesburg Prison in Philadelphia made extensive use of inmates for medical experiments. Some of the victims are still around to talk about it. Edward "Yusef" Anthony, featured in a book about the studies, says he agreed to have a layer of skin peeled off his back, which was coated with searing chemicals to test a drug. He did that for money to buy cigarettes in prison. "I said 'Oh my God, my back is on fire! Take this ... off me!'" Anthony said in an interview with The Associated Press, as he recalled the beginning of weeks of intense itching and agonizing pain. The government responded with reforms. Among them: The U.S. Bureau of Prisons in the mid-1970s effectively excluded all research by drug companies and other outside agencies within federal prisons. As the supply of prisoners and mental patients dried up, researchers looked to other countries. It made sense. Clinical trials could be done more cheaply and with fewer rules. And it was easy to find patients who were taking no medication, a factor that can complicate tests of other drugs. Additional sets of ethical guidelines have been enacted, and few believe that another Guatemala study could happen today. "It's not that we're out infecting anybody with things," Caplan said. Still, in the last 15 years, two international studies sparked outrage. One was likened to Tuskegee. U.S.-funded doctors failed to give the AIDS drug AZT to all the HIV-infected pregnant women in a study in Uganda even though it would have protected their newborns. U.S. health officials argued the study would answer questions about AZT's use in the developing world. The other study, by Pfizer Inc., gave an antibiotic named Trovan to children with meningitis in Nigeria, although there were doubts about its effectiveness for that disease. Critics blamed the experiment for the deaths of 11 children and the disabling of scores of others. Pfizer settled a lawsuit with Nigerian officials for $75 million but admitted no wrongdoing. Last year, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' inspector general reported that between 40 and 65 percent of clinical studies of federally regulated medical products were done in other countries in 2008, and that proportion probably has grown. The report also noted that U.S. regulators inspected fewer than 1 percent of foreign clinical trial sites. Monitoring research is complicated, and rules that are too rigid could slow new drug development. But it's often hard to get information on international trials, sometimes because of missing records and a paucity of audits, said Dr. Kevin Schulman, a Duke University professor of medicine who has written on the ethics of international studies. These issues were still being debated when, last October, the Guatemala study came to light. In the 1946-48 study, American scientists infected prisoners and patients in a mental hospital in Guatemala with syphilis, apparently to test whether penicillin could prevent some sexually transmitted disease. The study came up with no useful information and was hidden for decades. The Guatemala study nauseated ethicists on multiple levels. Beyond infecting patients with a terrible illness, it was clear that people in the study did not understand what was being done to them or were not able to give their consent. Indeed, though it happened at a time when scientists were quick to publish research that showed frank disinterest in the rights of study participants, this study was buried in file drawers. "It was unusually unethical, even at the time," said Stark, the Wesleyan researcher. "When the president was briefed on the details of the Guatemalan episode, one of his first questions was whether this sort of thing could still happen today," said Rick Weiss, a spokesman for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. That it occurred overseas was an opening for the Obama administration to have the bioethics panel seek a new evaluation of international medical studies. The president also asked the Institute of Medicine to further probe the Guatemala study, but the IOM relinquished the assignment in November, after reporting its own conflict of interest: In the 1940s, five members of one of the IOM's sister organizations played prominent roles in federal syphilis research and had links to the Guatemala study. So the bioethics commission gets both tasks. To focus on federally funded international studies, the commission has formed an international panel of about a dozen experts in ethics, science and clinical research. Regarding the look at the Guatemala study, the commission has hired 15 staff investigators and is working with additional historians and other consulting experts. The panel is to send a report to Obama by September. Any further steps would be up to the administration. Some experts say that given such a tight deadline, it would be a surprise if the commission produced substantive new information about past studies. "They face a really tough challenge," Caplan said. ___ AP news researchers Susan James and Julie Reed Bell contributed to this report.

Copyright 2011 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

* * * *


fair use notice: this site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. we are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, & social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US copyright law. In accordance with title 17 usc section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

* * * *
* * * *

Ben Livingston: The Father Of Weaponized Weather


Text with video:

THElNFOWARRlOR | Feb 13, 2011 | 273 likes, 7 dislikes

Veteran weather modification expert Ben Livingston is a former Navy Physicist who briefed President Lyndon B. Johnson on the effectiveness of weather control back in the 1960's during the Vietnam era, when he was involved in cloud seeding programs that worked to slow down the advance of Vietnamese and Korean troops. Livingston asserts that asserts that hurricane control was a national priority of the government more than 40 years ago and that the technology was fully operational to control the weather at the time.

In this exclusive interview for Prison Planet.tv subscribers, Livingston explains how for decades the US government has had the power to both lessen and increase the severity of adverse weather for their own purposes.

Dr. Livingston was assigned in 1966 from the Naval weapons research Laboratory to a marine fighter squadron in Vietnam. Instead of guns, the aircraft under Livingston's control were fitted with cloud seeding equipment. "My mission was to find clouds and seed them for maximum precipitation value" he stated.

Dr. Livingston presents evidence from the Stanford research Institute, who were brought into Project Storm Fury (a weather control program) in the late sixties as a third party, which stated conclusively that knowledge of how to stop hurricanes had been uncovered and that they would be directly liable should a hurricane hit and cause extensive damage and loss of life. Four decades later and Livingston exposes how the devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina could have been greatly minimized but was allowed to fully impact Gulf states for political reasons.

Having personally flown on 265 missions into the eyes of hurricanes, Livingston remarks that he was "disgusted" by the failure to lessen the impact of Katrina. Livingston's revelations that weather control has been a decades long program in which the US government has been deeply involved are particularly alarming given the abundant modern-day evidence of how chemtrails are being used to warp our environment in a secret geoengineering plot that threatens a myriad of unknown human health and ecological consequences.
http://prisonplanet.tv

* * * *
* * * *

[click here] for:

US Gov Puppeteers' Agenda Discussed (video)