Tuesday, July 01, 2008

In by email:

INTRODUCTION

I.THE HISTORY OF JUDICIAL ARROGANCE TO FOUR CENTRAL ASPECTS OF THE PETITION CLAUSE

A)ASPECT ONE: THE RIGHT OF PETITION FOR REDRESS vs. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY

B)ASPECT TWO: JUDICIALLY CREATED PERSONAL & OFFICIAL IMMUNITY

C)ASPECT THREE: POLITICAL PERSECUTION FOR EXERCISING PETITION RIGHTS

D)ASPECT FOUR: THE JUDICIAL CONTEMPT FOR PETITIONING TO REDRESS GRIEVANCES WITH GOVERNMENT IN FEDERAL COURT

II.THE DUEL MEANING OF THE PETITION CLAUSE: PROCEDURAL vs. SUBSTANTIVE

III. THE JUDICIARY IS ORGANIZED TO AVOID SUBSTANTIVE REDRESS OF CONSTITUTIONAL GRIEVANCES AND REASONABLE EXPLANATION OF UNREDRESSABILITY

IV. CONCLUSION


INTRODUCTION

The right (of petition) embraces dissent, and "would seem unnecessary to be expressly provided for in a republican government, since it results from the very nature and structure of its institutions. It is impossible that it could be practically denied until the spirit of liberty had wholly disappeared and the people had become so servile and debased as to be unfit to exercise any of the privileges of freemen." "[D]eprivation of it would at once be felt by every freeman as a degradation. (2)



* * * *

On September 2nd we will Rally for Freedom and Constitutional Law in Minnesota across the river from the GOP presidential national convention.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Power is the great evil with which we are contending. We have divided power between three branches of government and erected checks and balances to prevent abuse of power.

However, where is the check on the power of the judiciary? If we fail to check the power of the judiciary, I predict that we will eventually live under judicial tyranny."

- Patrick Henry

Wednesday, July 02, 2008 11:10:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


View My Stats