Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Stafford Springs Connecticut Drug Dealer Shoots Pig in Head

click on pictures to make bigger

February 03, 2004

Drug Dealer/House Breaker shoots pig in head, downtown Stafford Springs, Connecticut


If you are a drug dealer in Connecticut, you may have few worries.

It seems to be ok to break into houses, deal drugs, steal computers and equipment destined to be delivered to the State of Connecticut (or from a contractor supplying equipment to the State of Connecticut), sell/use prescription drugs, sell stolen items and guns, steal tools and equipment from employers, stage accidents, commit fraud, sue for injuries, teach children that crime does pay, and live life as a career criminal parasite.

It is not ok to work hard, invest in downtown property, have a small business, sweat and save, teach children morals, and test the First Amendment by proposing laws to politicians and complaining about the bias and immoral activities of police and officials in newspapers.

The individual with the pig�s severed head, with the bullet hole in it, in front of him, has the initials, �S.W�, took the screws off my door, breaking into my home. He stole my cell phone charger, tools, and other items.

I notified police that this individual was trafficking in drugs, selling stolen guns, sending his two boys out selling drugs, doing drugs and drinking with his kids, not sending them to school, fencing stolen items, and teaching them also how to break-in houses as a business.

The police officer on the other end of the phone line yelled at me, threatened me, and told me I could be arrested, for what?!!! I was only trying to report criminals and crimes being committed.

Why protect criminals if you are a police officer, unless they are brothers in arms, fleecing hard working, taxpaying citizens out of the hours, days, and years they slave just to get by, day to day.

Police and government budgets can be bolstered by such activities. They can get increases in State and Police budgets citing rampant crime. When teens and adults abuse alcohol, tobacco and drugs, the State benefits in millions in cigarette/alcohol taxes, and can seize houses, cash, and assets from the middle managers, as a tax (like from a legitimate business), from middle managers in the illegal drug delivery system.

Why should the police and authorities be bothered with shutting off the tap of an endless supply of taxpayer dollars?

By reducing crime, acting in the public�s best interest, being efficient, budgets (revenue collection) would be reduced along with State, city, and town jobs. Being efficient, honest, and acting in your best interest is counterproductive for them.

Allowing more and more crimes and criminals allows for more prison cells. Each inmate costs taxpayers on average, $73/inmate/day, allows government to grow, and is a taxpayer fleecing, gold mine for States and the Federal Government.

Preventing crime would keep so many, mostly ethic and those perceived as �White Trash� from being sent away for years and years, as felons, from mostly downtown areas. Who wants those perceived as inferior to actually have a quality of life, financial freedom, and a piece of the American pie? Certainly not the Blue Bloods that operate our country like it is a Parker Brothers game, Monopoly and Risk.

Prisons can be used as birth control and a warehouse for those the American power brokers deem as less than human, not deserving a quality of life and a piece of the pie. Prison cells may also be used to �quiet� more and more Americans that are fed up with being �screwed� over by authorities voicing their complaints in newspapers and to politicians, which I am a good example of that policy.
-Steven G. Erickson (click on my name for my story on injusticebusters.com)

The legal system is complete bullshit. (Story)

P.S. S.W. did end up getting arrested for stealing a package of hotdogs from a supermarket, shoving them down his pants while carrying possibly a huge roll of hundred dollars bills, his trademark, and for doing donuts in his pick-up truck while drunk in a strip bar parking lot. His young son, not old enough to have a driver�s license, stole a car while drunk and high, almost killing himself and his young girlfriend, slamming into a tree with a stolen car running from police.

As far as I know, members of this �crime family�, and others, that have been committing crimes and profiting for years and years, and none to my knowledge have done any prison time.

So, it is my opinion, the police, the courts, and most elected officials are out to get as much from you, the taxpayer in declared and undeclared taxes as they possibly can, caring little to none at all for you or in acting in your family�s best interests.

How a criminal breeding ground (an American downtown) works.

Click for an open letter to Connecticut Governor Rowland, Oct. 2, 2003, complaining about criminal breeding grounds, downtown Connecticut. The post stayed at the #2 most popular destination for the words plugged in, �Governor Rowland� in a yahoo, google, and AOL search engines, for quite a time.


(added 12:48 PM EST)
2 past FreeSpeech.com posts involving PeTA:

Do you wear plastic shoes, don�t eat meat, and does your fat ass rarely leave the couch? (post Dec. 7, 2003)

Has Peta gone too far? (post Dec. 26, 2003)

Posted by Vikingas at February 3, 2004 10:01 AM TrackBack

Just as a thought: you can put these kinds of pictures which might get me in trouble at work below the front page, in the "continue reading" section. Obviously, this is completely up to you, but I highly doubt I'm the only person who reads this stuff at work....

Posted by: Kenneth G. Cavness at February 3, 2004 10:36 AM

I'd appreciate keeping big pics in the "Continue reading" section as well. If you want to put them in the main body then use the thumbnail + popup tool..

Posted by: Del Simmons at February 3, 2004 11:55 AM

it sounds like your workplace is very strict. It sounds like you should not bring up any news sites, nevermind FreeSpeech.com, if your bosses will take exception with what can be seen now and then on this site.

I think the picture lends itself to the piece as a picture paints a 1000 words. Also, post just the story and there are more doubters.

To this one there are plenty of witnesses, reports, etc to verify that it is the truth.

As with my main bitch there was just too much over too much time that happened, for those that wish to doubt me, to be able to continue to doubt me if they do any research into the events and names I have posted.

Posted by: Steven G. Erickson at February 3, 2004 11:57 AM

Just read your comment, after already posting mine, Del. Do you want me to pass photos by you before posting?

Thank you again for being able to post on this site.

Posted by: Steven G. Erickson at February 3, 2004 12:04 PM

Well, I asked politely. As I said, it's completely up to you.

Del, I'm afraid I'm going to have to forego FreeSpeech at work for now. I'll continue to read it from home.

Posted by: Kenneth G. Cavness at February 3, 2004 12:13 PM


I don't think you will ever need to "pass a picture by me" in order to post it. I'm just saying that big pictures on the front page aren't always the best idea. If it's got a naked woman, or a disemboweled beast in it, then make it a small thumbnail or put it on the second page.

Here's a rule of thumb. If you're posting the pic to get a rise out of someone, like you obviously are with this one and with the naked chick last week, then either use a small thumbnail or post in on the second page.

How about that?

I'm trying to foster a site here that people look and and say "Cool! A site with open political discourse, that discusses topics that most people find interesting". What I'm not trying to get people to think is "Wow, a site with naked tits" or "Neat, a site with a disembodied animals".

We already have "Page3" and "Ogrish.com" for those two categories..


Posted by: Del Simmons at February 3, 2004 12:22 PM

PeTA and others can put whatever they want on billboards.

When Time, Newsweek, USNews, and others may post disturbing photos involving humans, should there be censorship here on FreeSpeech.com, Ken?

To those that think having an actual alarming, unfair, and illegal situation exposed, should not read FreeSpeech, watch the news, nor discuss current events with photo and video back-up.

They should just sit on their couch, eat cheese doodles, and tell others what they can eat, watch on tv and do for recreation. If America becomes even more like that I will show her my back, and never return.

Also, Ken, if one poster gets more attention than, let's just say for example, YOU, should that poster be banned or censored?

Posted by: Steven G. Erickson at February 3, 2004 12:26 PM

just read your comment. I guess I am not good at reading reactions. I thought providing proof of a situation as a lead in would cause alarm about what I was posting about, not about the animal.

From having been brought out to farms by my Dad, who grew up on a farm, seeing such sites as a toddler, makes seeing an animal butchered humanely, not as alarming as seeing a drug dealer whip out his pistol and shoot it in a crowded downtown area.

Especially if the drug dealer openly dealt drugs in the local bars and out of his apartment at 3 Church St, Stafford Springs, CT.

Posted by: Steven G. Erickson at February 3, 2004 12:34 PM

If Ted Kennedy can go drive off a bridge with a woman that is not his wife and swim away as she drowns, who are you?

Did he get in trouble? No. He ran for President.

Little sheep go to prison, pay taxes, and eat shit.

Wolves such as Kennedy eat sheep, not shit.

Posted by: Sandman at February 3, 2004 04:44 PM


There are no PETA billboards in the presence of my building. Your comment, while cogent as an argument for being able to put up graphic photos, has no relevence here.

I did not ask you to remove these pictures -- merely to put them under the fold so that when I open up the FreeSpeech.com web page at work, I am able to do so without fear of someone walking by and being offended by what they see. In a place of business, this is perfectly acceptable and only polite. Those sites that do not follow this are sites that I will not visit while at work.

I really wish you'd figure out what censorship was. I'm in no position of authority to keep you from doing anything you want with Del's site. I'd hope that you'd respect the wishes of the people you have been so kindly granted an audience to, or at least keep them in mind when their request is reasonable. I think mine was totally reasonable.

Again, I was trying to appeal to your sense of courtesy, not trying to force you to remove the pictures from the site. That you choose not to do such a thing, even at the very polite request of Del for completely separate reasons, is extremely telling. And sad.

When CNN, MSNBC, &etc have extremely disturbing pictures they want to make available to the public, they do so by providing a polite warning that the images they are about to see are graphic, and they put them behind a link -- not because of FCC rules or any government regulations, but simply because they are aware that they have a diverse audience and they want to do any small things that they can do in order to make the viewing experience pleasant and informative.

FreeSpeech.com has no guidelines, and thus we are forced to attempt to use persuasion rather than draconian measures like censorship. Keep that in mind the next time you go wailing and gnashing your teeth about banning and censorship.

You've removed my ability, in posting large pictures of nearly-nude women, racisct comics, and graphic displays of violence on the front pages of this site. Due to your reckless actions, I've been forced to limit the time I spend here. That's fine with me, and given your hatred of me and your feelings of me, I'm sure it's grand with you as well.

Posted by: Kenneth G. Cavness at February 3, 2004 06:30 PM

I heard women up North were fat and ugly it is now proved. Nice pig woman she is too fat and hairy for me.

Posted by: Sandman at February 3, 2004 10:01 PM


Posted by: at April 4, 2004 05:53 PM

hy there nice place here

Posted by: karanka at May 18, 2004 06:23 PM


Post a Comment

<< Home

View My Stats